Kauaʻi Conservation Atlas

Kauaʻi record · KCA-CR-000085

Freshwater shrimp

Neocaridina denticulata

Open this record in the interactive Atlas
Neocaridina denticulata — Neocaridina denticulata. Atlas ecological plate.
Neocaridina denticulata — Neocaridina denticulata. Atlas ecological plate. · Kauaʻi Conservation Atlas · AI-generated Atlas reconstruction · approved_primary_plate_v1.5.3 · Image source

About Freshwater shrimp

Neocaridina denticulata is a decapod crustacean in the family Atyidae. Its current scientific name is cited as Neocaridina denticulata (De Haan, 1844). Published Kauaʻi evidence documents the species from Kauaʻi freshwater systems. Evidence types include island checklist. These records establish a documented Kauaʻi occurrence but are not automatically interpreted as a present-day abundance estimate. The documented Kauaʻi habitat context includes freshwater. Current island persistence, abundance, and population trend were not established by the occurrence material used for this record. The available Kauaʻi evidence does not support adding island-specific claims about diet, reproduction, behavior, population size, or trend unless those points are stated in the cited sources, so they are not inferred here. Keeping the accepted taxonomic concept together with the dated occurrence evidence allows later surveys to distinguish historical documentation from contemporary status.

Names and classification

Scientific name
Neocaridina denticulata
Common names
Freshwater shrimp
Hawaiian names
ʻŌpae
Other names
Neocaridina denticulata · crustacean · crustaceans · shrimp · shrimps · ʻŌpae
Family
Atyidae
Order
Decapoda
Record type
species

Kauaʻi occurrence and status

Kauaʻi occurrence
confirmed by published Kauaʻi occurrence evidence
Origin
Origin not yet resolved
Conservation status
Not assessed

Process and seasonal context

Seasonal description
Neocaridina denticulata (Neocaridina denticulata) is a confirmed Kauaʻi crustacean species documented from Kauaʻi freshwater systems. The occurrence is retained with its source date and status so historical evidence is not presented as a current population estimate.

Sources and further reading

Suggest changes to this record